Vital Choice - Wild Seafood & Organics
Click to Call
Food, Health, and Eco-news
Whole Grains Linked to Lower Breast Cancer Risks
Overlooked “X” factor in grains may add to their health benefits 03/11/2019 By Craig Weatherby

Whole grains have always been a foundation of the “health food” movement.

That’s been true since the movement’s emergence in the 1870s through its strong resurgence in the late 1960s, and mainstream research has confirmed the health benefits of whole grains.

The core principles of the venerable health food movement remain simple and clear: minimize refined/processed/artificial foods in favor of whole, unprocessed, natural foods.

Once considered fringe or even flaky, those principles now enjoy overwhelming evidence, and guide dietary advice from establishment institutions like the USDA and the National Institutes of Health.

However, grains — including whole grains — are opposed by prominent advocates of the Paleo diet.

To be sure, the gluten protein in wheat, barley, rye, and some other grains is dangerous to people with celiac disease.

And there’s been a rise in the (still-tiny) proportion of people who are genuinely sensitive to gluten — as opposed to other potentially gut-upsetting food factors such as FODMAPs.

For more on gluten and FODMAPs, see Gluten Often Plays the Gut-Health Patsy, Do Whole Grains Hurt or Help Gut Health?, and their links to related articles.

But those problems affecting a very small minority of people have increasingly become the irrational rationale for demonization of all grains, including whole grains.

In fact, the available evidence strongly suggests that diets rich in whole grains are actively healthful for the great majority of people, reducing the risks for cardiovascular disease — and, somewhat counterintuitively — the risk for diabetes.

For more on the evidence concerning the health effects of whole grains, see Do Grains Help or Harm Health? and Whole Grains May Help Deflect Diabetes.

Background to the new findings
Earlier this year, a U.S.-China research team examined the available epidemiological evidence concerning possible links between various diets and types of food and the risk for breast cancer (Xiao Y et al. 2019).

As they wrote, “High intakes of red meat, animal fats, and refined carbohydrates [e.g., white bread and pastries] have been shown to be associated with an increased risk, whereas intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and dietary fiber has been linked with a reduced risk of breast cancer.”

Now, the results of an evidence review published last fall by many of the same researchers add more evidence that diets relatively rich in whole grains may help reduce the risk of breast cancer.

Here’s how the American-Chinese team expressed the motivation for their study: “Epidemiological studies have found that high whole grain intake may be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, the evidence has not been consistent.”

Ironically, their January 2019 evidence review did not include the results of their own September 2018 evidence review — probably because the 2018 paper hadn’t been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication before they completed their 2019 review.

As we’ll see, their 2018 paper linked diets relatively rich in whole grains to modestly but significantly reduced risks for breast cancer.

After examining their review of the evidence, will look at the plausible reasons why whole grains might reduce the risk for cancer, including breast cancer.

U.S.-China review links whole grains to reduced breast cancer risks
This evidence review was conducted by researchers at Harvard University, Missouri’s Washington University School of Medicine, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Shenzhen, China (Xiao Y et al. 2018).

Theirs was the first review of evidence from observational studies that had specifically looked for links between whole grain intakes and the risk of breast cancer.

They conducted a relatively sophisticated type of evidence review — called a meta-analysis — to look for possible links between the risk for breast cancer and diets with different intakes of whole grains.

Out of more than 400 potential candidates for inclusion, they selected 11 studies that met their quality criteria, including four cohort and seven case-control studies that involved 131,151 participants in total. (See “About cohort and case-control studies” below to learn about the differences between them.)

After analyzing the data from all 11 studies, the American-Chinese team calculated that the risk of developing breast cancer was 16% lower among the participants with high versus low self-reported intakes of whole grains.

As they wrote, “The results suggest that intermediate and high intake levels of whole grain were associated with a modest reduction of breast cancer risk.”

Their analysis of the seven case-control studies showed that the risk for breast cancer was 31% lower among the participants whose self-reported diets contain relatively high proportions of whole grains.

In contrast, their analysis of data from the smaller (less than 2,300 participants) studies — tended to be less well-designed — detected a much smaller 4% drop in breast cancer risk among participants whose self-reported diets were relatively high in whole grains.

That finding of only a small reduction in risk was especially true of the case-control studies, possibly because such studies are more susceptible to errors in people’s memories of their diets.

Given the limitations of many of the studies included in their review — which were the best available — they acknowledged the need for more large-scale cohort studies.

Why would whole grains reduce breast cancer risk?
The authors of the 2018 evidence review proposed several reasons why whole grains might reduce the risk of breast cancer.

For starters, whole grains contain various micronutrients, antioxidants, fibers, and “bioactive” fibers that are lost in the refining process but may help prevent cancer.

They cited five specific characteristics of whole grains that could explain any anti-cancer effects:

  1. Higher blood insulin levels have been linked with increased breast cancer risk, and whole grains reduce the glucose and insulin responses to meals, leading to better blood-sugar and insulin control.
  2. Whole grains have been linked to lower levels of markers for systemic inflammation and liver enzymes, higher levels of which have been linked to higher cancer risks.
  3. Whole grains are rich in fiber, which has been linked to reduced breast cancer risk, and is known to produce of a variety of effects associated with reduced cancer risk.
  4. Whole grains are rich in antioxidants, including vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, polyphenols and trace minerals (selenium, zinc, copper, and manganese) that are essential components of the body’s own antioxidant enzymes
  5. Whole grains provide significant amounts of phytoestrogens and lignans, which play important protective roles against cancer through their antioxidant properties and ability to inhibit cell proliferation and angiogenesis (the creation of blood vessels to feed tumors), to trigger apoptosis (cellular “suicide”) in cancer cells, and to modulate hormonal pathways in ways known to discourage cancer.

Another possible cancer-preventive factor in whole grains
In recent years, Danish researchers discovered that whole grains contain a once-obscure family of antioxidants called benzoxazinoids or BX.

Importantly, they also found BX in baked whole-grain bread and other whole-grain products, that BX passes through the gut wall and circulates in the body, and that the metabolic byproducts of dietary BX end up in various organs.

Why would the presence of BX in whole grains matter to cancer prevention?

It turns out that diets rich in BX make certain immune system cells to react more strongly to some types of bacteria and that BX compounds appear to suppress the growth of prostate cancer. (Its effects on other types of cancer have not been studied.)

For example, men with prostate cancer who ate six slices of whole rye bread daily showed lower levels of PSA (prostate-specific antigen), which indicates that the cancer is being suppressed.

In addition, lab studies found that diets rich in whole rye suppressed prostate cancer in mice, while test tube studies found that BX compounds suppress the growth of prostate cancer cells.

About case-control and cohort studies
Case-control and cohort studies are two different “observational” types of epidemiological studies.

While their findings aren’t as reliable as the results of randomized, controlled clinical trials, the evidence produced by well-designed cohort and case-control studies is taken seriously, especially if findings are consistent across several such studies.

Case-control studies examine the health outcomes among two groups — one with a given disease and one without that disease — and then look for statistically significant differences in their exposure to a potential risk or prevention factor within each group, such as intakes of whole grains.

Cohort studies can be retrospective (backward-looking) or prospective (forward-looking). In retrospective cohort studies, researchers analyze the data collected during the study to see whether exposure to a risk factor resulted in a statistically significant difference in the risk for a given disease.

Prospective cohort studies are more common and generally produce more reliable results. Researchers will follow the study participants over time to see how many develop the disease in question and then compare the disease rates between people with different characteristics — such as substantially different intakes of whole grains.




  • Adhikari KB, Laursen BB, Gregersen PL, Schnoor HJ, Witten M, Poulsen LK, Jensen BM, Fomsgaard IS. Absorption and metabolic fate of bioactive dietary benzoxazinoids in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 Oct;57(10):1847-58. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300107. Epub 2013 May 3.
  • Aune D et al. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. (2011)
  • Benisi-Kohansal S, Saneei P, Salehi-Marzijarani M, Larijani B, Esmaillzadeh A. Whole-Grain Intake and Mortality from All Causes, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):1052-1065. doi: 10.3945/an.115.011635. Print 2016 Nov. Review.
  • Buchmann CA, Nersesyan A, Kopp B, Schauberger D, Darroudi F, Grummt T, Krupitza G, Kundi M, Schulte-Hermann R, Knasmueller S. Dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) and 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIBOA), two naturally occurring benzoxazinones contained in sprouts of Gramineae are potent aneugens in human-derived liver cells (HepG2). Cancer Lett. 2007 Feb 8;246(1-2):290-9. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
  • Dong JY, He K, Wang P, Qin LQ. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(3):900–905. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015578.
  • Gleńsk M, Gajda B, Franiczek R, Krzyżanowska B, Biskup I, Włodarczyk M. In vitro evaluation of the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of DIMBOA [2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-3(4H)-one]. Nat Prod Res. 2016 Jun;30(11):1305-8. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1054284. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
  • Jensen BM, Adhikari KB, Schnoor HJ, Juel-Berg N, Fomsgaard IS, Poulsen LK. Quantitative analysis of absorption, metabolism, and excretion of benzoxazinoids in humans after the consumption of high- and low-benzoxazinoid diets with similar contents of cereal dietary fibres: a crossover study. Eur J Nutr. 2017 Feb;56(1):387-397. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1088-6. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
  • La Vecchia C, Decarli A, Franceschi S, Gentile A, Negri E, Parazzini F. Dietary factors and the risk of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer. 1987;10(4):205–214. doi: 10.1080/01635588709513958.
  • Levi F, La Vecchia C, Gulie C, Negri E. Dietary factors and breast cancer risk in Vaud, Switzerland. Nutr Cancer. 1993;19(3):327–335. doi: 10.1080/01635589309514263.
  • Makarem N et al. Consumption of whole grains and cereal fiber in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Nutr Rev. (2016)
  • Mandrioli D, Belpoggi F, Silbergeld EK, Perry MJ. Aneuploidy: a common and early evidence-based biomarker for carcinogens and reproductive toxicants. Environ Health. 2016 Oct 12;15(1):97. Review.
  • Matralis AN, Bavavea EI, Incerpi S, Pedersen JZ, Kourounakis AP. Balancing Antioxidant, Hypolipidemic and Anti-inflammatory Activity in a Single Agent: The Example of 2-Hydroxy-2-Substituted Morpholine, 1,4-Benzoxazine and 1,4-Benzothiazine Derivatives as a Rational Therapeutic Approach against Atherosclerosis. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(12):1214-1227. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160814001803. Review.
  • Nicodemus KK, Jacobs DR, Jr, Folsom AR. Whole and refined grain intake and risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(10):917–925. doi: 10.1023/A:1013746719385.
  • Potapova TA, Zhu J, Li R. Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability: a vicious cycle driving cellular evolution and cancer genome chaos. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013 Dec;32(3-4):377-89. doi: 10.1007/s10555-013-9436-6. Review.
  • Steffensen SK, Pedersen HA, Adhikari KB, Laursen BB, Jensen C, Høyer S, Borre M, Pedersen HH, Borre M, Edwards D, Fomsgaard IS. Benzoxazinoids in Prostate Cancer Patients after a Rye-Intensive Diet: Methods and Initial Results. J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Nov 2;64(43):8235-8245. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
  • Wenzel ES, Singh ATK. Cell-cycle Checkpoints and Aneuploidy on the Path to Cancer. In Vivo. 2018 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-5. Review.
  • Wu WH, Chen TY, Lu RW, Chen ST, Chang CC. Benzoxazinoids from Scoparia dulcis (sweet broomweed) with antiproliferative activity against the DU-145 human prostate cancer cell line. Phytochemistry. 2012 Nov;83:110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
  • Xiao Y, Ke Y, Wu S, Huang S, Li S, Lv Z, Yeoh EK, Lao X, Wong S, Kim JH, Colditz GA, Tamimi RM, Su X. Association between whole grain intake and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr J. 2018 Sep 21;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0394-2.
  • Xiao Y, Xia J, Li L, Ke Y, Cheng J, Xie Y, Chu W, Cheung P, Kim JH, Colditz GA, Tamimi RM, Su X. Associations between dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 29;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1096-1.
  • Zhang B, Zhao Q, Guo W, Bao W, Wang X. Association of whole grain intake with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis from prospective cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jan;72(1):57-65. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.149. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

quote-icon Purchasing from Vital Choice is always seamless, and the fish is superior to everything else! We love Vital Choice! quote-icon

quote-icon is my favorite source for wild Alaskan salmon, sablefish, sardines, and other fish rich in omega-3s... I can't tell you how many messages I get from people thanking me for recommending Vital Choice.
Simply put Vital Choice offers the best seafood and related products available. We have always recommended Vital Choice to clients, friends, and family. As health practitioners we value the sustainable practices and trust this company implicitly!

quote-icon Without a doubt the best canned seafood I’ve ever tasted. quote-icon

Unlike anything you've seen from the grocery store…I recommend Vital Choice—my personal favorite for delicious, fresh, healthy, and completely safe canned tuna and salmon.
Vital Box captures the fresh-caught quality of succulent, sustainably harvested Alaskan salmon and northwest Pacific seafood by cleaning and flash-freezing it within hours of harvest.
I purchased for my brother (difficult to buy for) and he loved it!! He can’t stop raving about the fish! Thank you for quality!

quote-icon The Best Places To Buy Seafood Online, Including Fresh And Frozen Fish quote-icon 

Find out what others are saying about Vital Choice